Skip to main content

Systems 1, 2, and 3 – the Paradigm of Consumer decision making


Businesses rise and fall based on consumer decision. When clients decide to buy, businesses thrive. They also stagnate or crash accordingly when sales begin to slow. These truths are known and have been a fact of doing business since the modern concept of the industry was conceived. The question behind why customers decide to make a purchase and when that decision happens, however, has been considered something of an unknown variable that made determining the best strategy to use when building a brand difficult. This is especially true when evaluating consumer behavior using “system 1” and “system 2” as the only two means through which analysis occurs. There is another system of decision-making that plays an even more important role in decision-making – system 3.
In order to understand how system 3 impacts business, it’s important to first understand the fundamentals of each of the three systems and how they fit into this systemic paradigm of consumer behavior. The diagram above illustrates where each system begins and ends. System 1 influences decisions that are made automatically. A consumer who has been buying the same brand of coffee for a decade, for example, will pick up that same brand when they’re running low. The decision is more an automatic and instinctive response that is made without much conscious consideration because it’s become a habit than it is a carefully considered transaction.
System 2 encompasses decisions that are more deliberate. Consumers operating in this mode consider objective facts about a product or service and determine which option best suits their needs. Someone who needs a new brand of coffee to help control acid reflux, for example, will likely be forced to eschew the coffee they’ve been drinking for years in favor of a new option. They do research about different brands on the market and make a decision based on which one fits their budgetary and dietary needs.
Both system 1 and system 2 are clearly defined in the paradigm and the model above. System 3, however, seems to be a bit more of an outlier. It doesn’t have any specific attributes that are ascribed to it, at least in the diagram. Where exactly does system 3 fit into the paradigm? It turns out that this particular system is both inherently connected to systems 1 and 2 while being distinctly separate from either. It’s a bit of an enigma, but one that plays a big role in consumer behavior and brand-building strategies.
What is system 3?
System 3 is a relatively new discovery in the world of decision-making that uses different parts of the brain than systems 1 and 2 while incorporating elements of both. Instead of focusing solely on familiarity and habit (system 1) or objective facts and how they relate to a consumer’s needs (system 2), system 3 utilizes the imagination to make decisions.
When customers make decisions about purchases, they oftentimes think about how the product in question will fit into their lives. How will the particular vacuum make life easier? Potential customers will think about the information they’ve gathered about the product in question and consider how it would help them. If they have mobility issues and the machine is lightweight and has plenty of extendable attachments to avoid the need to bend over, for example, they might very well imagine themselves cleaning their living room with the cleaner.
That thought – that combination of system 1 thinking and system 2 thinking into a cohesive imaginary situation that enables customers to relate to different products and ultimately make a decision – occurs in system 3. The customer considered the choices at hand and picked the option they imagined would fit their needs the best. That’s a system 3 decision, but it’s one made using information derived from both system 1 and system 2 considerations. But what does this mean for business?
The System 1, 2, and 3 Paradigm and Business
System 3 becomes especially important to business when the time to build a brand or launch a new product arrives. If a brand or product is new, then system 1 thinking will be of little help to professionals trying to make a sale. System 2 thinking can help as long as the information disseminated is easy to understand, but it likely won’t create the emotional confidence many consumers need to make a purchase. That’s where system 3 comes in. Target customers’ imaginations and make it easy for them to imagine themselves using your product, and they’ll have an easier time choosing you over the competition. Brands designed to make customers think the products in question will make them happier than other options are bound for success.
The bottom line? Businesses should appeal to systems 1, 2, and 3 when building their brands and product lines. Communicate in system 1, think in system 2, and build a brand using system 3.  

By Thomas George, Director of DoWell Research GmbH

Enhancing innovation by crowdsourcing and co-creation with users in product/service design, Open innovation consulting




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Big mac index & Starbucks index - Its relevance in global business development.

The global marketplace is an ever-changing space. This is perhaps especially true in the financial sector, where currencies from all over the world come together and are routinely evaluated and reevaluated with every fluctuation of the market. Certain currencies tend to stay fairly stable as far as valuation is concerned and the spectrum within which they move is narrow. For others, the fluctuations are far more significant. In order to look at the value of currencies in an interesting way, two special “indexes” were created. These are the Starbucks “Latte Index” and the “Big Mac Index”. What are the Latte Index and the Big Mac Index? The Big Mac Index is the older of the two indexes in question and was created in 1986 by  The Economist.  It was never intended to be a serious measure of currency valuation, but rather a lighthearted approximation of how global currencies compare to one another. The Latte Index was created by  The Wall Street Journal  in 2017 an...

Measurement of customer satisfaction in marketing research

We can measure customer satisfaction level of marketing research projects using PZB model. According to Parasuraman, Zeithaml and Beiry (PZB) model,  Perceived Service Quality = Perceived Service - Expected Service . Based on their research work, they identified that customers consider five dimensions in their assessment of service quality which results customer satisfaction, as given below: Reliability:  Ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately Responsiveness:  Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service Assurance:  Employee's knowledge and courtesy and their ability to inspire trust and confidence. Empathy:  Caring, individualised attention given to customers Tangibles:  Appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel and written materials Scale can be developed for these attributes and weightage to be assigned. Then use an empirical model to calculate Perceived service. Assume...

Think in system 2, communicate in system 1

According to psychologists, there are two different types of thinking – system 1 and system 2.  System 1 is fast-paced thinking we seem to do almost automatically while system 2 is more thoughtful and only activated when needed. We have two systems because a lot of our day is taken up by routine. To cope with the repetitive actions that don’t require much thought, we’ve developed an “automatic” thinking process in system 1. It requires less energy than system 2, so we use it throughout the entire day.  System 1 is prone to errors and bias, making us think more emotionally and impulsively. On the other hand, system 2 is only engaged when it is needed. When we want to make an educated, rational decision, or when system 1 encounters something out of the routine, the part of our minds that do the “heavy lifting” comes into play. Brands and companies can utilise these thinking systems when building their marketing strategy. Businesses need to think in system 2 but communica...